Brothers of Jesus?

Recently an archeological find of great importance to Bible scholars was announced in the press. An ossuary (bone box) surfaced as part of a private collection with the inscription “James the son of Joseph, the brother of Jesus.” In June 2003 the Israel Antiquities Authority declared it a forgery.

In the New Testament there are passages referring to Jesus’ brothers and sisters.

“Is this not the carpenter, the son of Mary, a brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? Are not his sisters our neighbors here? (Mk. 6: 3, 3: 21, 31, Mt. 13: 56, Jn. 7: 5, Gal. 1: 19).

Most main line churches support the doctrine of the virgin birth which is presented in the Gospels and handed down in the Nicene Creed. However in Roman Catholic theology we also describe the Blessed Mother as “ever virgin” which arose early in Christianity. It was very much part of theology in the Middle Ages. It appeared in the reformers confessional writings (Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli; Book of Concord, Smalcald Articles).

Who then were these so called “brothers and sisters of Jesus?”

The setting in which the family of Jesus lived was Hebrew-Aramaic. In those languages there were limited words for relationships. On the male side there is only father, son, or brother. On the female side there is only mother, sister, or daughter. There are no words for cousin, uncle, aunt, etc.

Thus when the Greek New Testament was written, the Aramaic relationship of brother and sister was handed down. It is not far fetched to assume that Jesus and his family were remembered according to the view presented in the original Hebrew-Aramaic setting.

If they weren’t brothers and sisters (adelphos/adelphe in Greek), who were they?

Some who accepted the ancient tradition that Mary was “ever virgin” believed that these “brothers” were actually half-brothers of Jesus; sons of Joseph by a previous marriage. He was therefore a widower with children when he took Mary who was with child into his home. There were no subsequent marital demands since Joseph was elderly. Joseph made no appearances during Jesus’ ministry since he was already deceased. Mary raised Joseph’s children. This was the theory of Epiphanius, an Eastern Church father.

The eminent Scripture scholar, Jerome, taught that these brothers were actually cousins, sons of Joseph’s brother or Mary’s sister. There is one additional factor that is of greatest importance in evaluating this issue. It seems highly unlikely that the doctrine of perpetual virginity would have gained acceptance in the early second century in view of the fact that these four so-called brothers became prominent movers in the early Church and one of them, James, became bishop of Jerusalem.

Did these “brothers” believe in Jesus and his vision of the kingdom?

There is another most interesting development in the history of these men called “the brothers of the Lord.” It is clear that they did not participate in or give any support to Jesus during his public ministry. In fact at the very beginning when he was gaining acceptance as a prophet and teacher of the people but had also antagonized the leading Pharisees, they revealed their disbelief if not their opposition.

“When his family heard of this they came to take charge of him saying he is out of his mind” (Mk. 3: 21). It is most significant that this negative attitude is also recorded in John’s Gospel which was written about twenty years later in Asia Minor. He had stopped in to visit the family home in Galilee.

“His brothers had this to say: ‘you ought to leave here and go to Judea, so that your disciples there might see the works that you are performing. No one who wishes to be known publicly keeps his actions hidden. If you are going to do things like this, you may as well display yourself to the world at large.’ As a matter of fact, not even his brothers had much confidence in him” (Jn. 7: 3-5).

What happened to change them?

Obviously something earthshaking had to occur to change the thinking of these men. The Apostle Paul in the first account of the resurrection tells us what happened.

“He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve…then by James, then by all the apostles. Last of all he was seen by me” (1 Cor. 15: 5, 7).

This James was the “brother of the Lord.” His next appearance was at the “upper room” in prayer after the ascension.

“There were some women in their company, and Mary the mother of Jesus and his brothers” (Acts 1: 14).

It is here that the power of that first Pentecost filled the lives of these followers of Jesus and the Church was born. He was the leader in Jerusalem (Acts 15: 13). Eusebius writes that he was called James the righteous because of his great virtue and he became the first bishop of Jerusalem. Ancient tradition states that he was thrown from the parapet of the temple but survived and then was stoned to death.

Comments

  1. mrfun says

    I don’t get why Mary had to be a virgin. Does that make her MORE special? Why couldn’t she have other children? Is it just a better storytelling motif? Is it meant to make the Jesus/Mary story more like the Mithras myth? Whats the difference?
    Strange stuff.

    • me says

      Just as the ark of the covenant in the old testament was not to be touched, so the ark of the new covenant was not to be touched or defiled in any way by what you would call loss of purity. Among other types, or foreshadowing, you can see how Mary’s role was not a temporary one or insignificant in any way. Jesus could have come to us by any means He wanted, and yet he chose to come to us through Mary, His mother and to follow his example and honor her as well. For 1500 years all Christians were Catholic, now all of a sudden, 500 years ago, Christianity was wrong? Now we have to face the unCatholic second vatican council and all the damage they are doing from within? The devil is behind all of this anti tradition throughout the Church….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *