- This topic has 1 reply, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by Anonymous.
November 14, 2006 at 5:01 pm #7399AnonymousInactive
VATICAN-MILINGO Nov-14-2006 (450 words) xxxi
Pope calls Curia to discuss married priests, Archbishop Milingo
By John Thavis
Catholic News Service
VATICAN CITY (CNS) — Pope Benedict XVI has convened top Vatican officials to discuss the case of excommunicated Zambian Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo and the status of married priests around the world.
The Vatican press office said the pope asked heads of major Roman Curia agencies to meet with him Nov. 16 to examine the situation created by the “disobedience” of Archbishop Milingo, who recently ordained four married men as bishops without papal permission.
The Vatican statement said the meeting would reflect on requests made by married priests in recent years for dispensation from the obligation of celibacy and on requests for readmission to the priestly ministry.
The Vatican spokesman, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, later said he did not expect the discussions to consider major changes in the priestly celibacy rule.
When ordained, Catholic priests in the Latin church make a promise of celibacy. In Eastern-rite Catholic churches, married men may become priests, but are not allowed to marry after ordination.
The Vatican encounter comes less than two weeks after Archbishop Milingo wrote an open letter to the pope, calling for immediate steps to accept married priests in the Catholic Church in order to end what he said was the church’s “dire straits because of the shortage of priests.”
[color=blue:1sm2x19x]In his letter, Archbishop Milingo said there were an estimated 150,000 married priests worldwide “who are ready and willing to serve.”[/color:1sm2x19x]
Archbishop Milingo, 76, married a South Korean woman in 2001 but left her at the request of Pope John Paul II and was reconciled with the Vatican. Last summer, however, the archbishop was reunited with his wife in the United States and founded a movement called Married Priests Now!
More than 20 heads of Vatican congregations and pontifical councils were expected to attend the Nov. 16 meeting. The Vatican said there were no additional agenda items.
The issue of priestly celibacy and the potential role of married priests came up at the Synod of Bishops on the Eucharist in late 2005. Several bishops at the synod asked for discussion of the possibility of ordaining married men to respond to priest shortages around the world.
But the synod ended up strongly affirming the value of priestly celibacy and made no recommendations for any change. The pope is expected to publish a document on the synod sometime soon.
Priests who request and obtain Vatican dispensation from priestly celibacy in order to marry are returned to the lay state. They are not allowed to administer the sacraments, except for granting absolution when there is danger of death, and are forbidden to assume some other functions in church life.November 14, 2006 at 6:13 pm #7405AnonymousInactive
[color=darkred:1illesg4]Weather, you do realize that these men were already married vs. priests being allowed to be married.[/color:1illesg4]November 14, 2006 at 7:55 pm #7407AnonymousInactive
No I didn’t know that,I guess I should have read article more closely,I thought they were priest’s who got married and left the priesthood,if the latter is the case isn’t a priest always a priest?November 14, 2006 at 9:04 pm #7408AnonymousInactive
[quote:269yzxf6]:oops: No I didn’t know that,I guess I should have read article more closely,I thought they were priest’s who got married and left the priesthood,if the latter is the case isn’t a priest always a priest?[/quote:269yzxf6]
[color=darkred:269yzxf6]I’m not sure I understand.[/color:269yzxf6]November 14, 2006 at 9:50 pm #7409AnonymousInactive
I guess what I mean if a priest quits and marrys and a law says priest can marry,cant that priest come back into the fold.November 15, 2006 at 8:54 am #7411AnonymousInactive
Just because the law changed does not change the fact that the priest broke a sacred vow and violated the law.November 15, 2006 at 7:10 pm #7418AnonymousInactive
[quote:14fq2xo5]I guess what I mean if a priest quits and marrys and a law says priest can marry,cant that priest come back into the fold.[/quote:14fq2xo5]
[color=darkred:14fq2xo5]It’s like asking me if my wife leaves me for another man, can she come back to me while still being with the other man.
What do you think?[/color:14fq2xo5]November 15, 2006 at 7:19 pm #7422About Catholics TeamKeymaster
[quote:u2meirlf][quote:u2meirlf]I guess what I mean if a priest quits and marrys and a law says priest can marry,cant that priest come back into the fold.[/quote:u2meirlf]
[color=darkred:u2meirlf]It’s like asking me if my wife leaves me for another man, can she come back to me while still being with the other man.
What do you think?[/color:u2meirlf][/quote:u2meirlf]
Not if the law changes in the mean time to say you can be with both which is what weather is asking. So then it’s probably ok, but there would be some sort of preparation period depending on how long someone has been away from the active priesthood.December 16, 2006 at 2:40 am #7601AnonymousInactive
Celibacy of Priests
Until Christ came along (Mt 19:12), and then Paul (1 Cor. 7:32-35),
the only state of life known was marriage. The rabbis taught that a
man was only half a man if he wasn’t married by 20. But even in the
Old Testament some of the prophets, like Elijah and Jeremiah, chose
celibacy. By Jesus’ time the great rabbis spoke of the possibility
of “marrying Torah,” that is, dedicating their whole life to the
study of the Word. Paul was one who did, both before and after his
conversion. Jesus is, of course, THE WORD, and infinitely more
deserving of total dedication than the written word.
It should not be surprising, therefore, that Jesus should speak of
some who would remain celibate (“eunuchs”) for the sake of the
Kingdom of God (Mt 19:12). St. Paul not only continued his pre-
conversion celibacy as a Christian but recommended it for those who
would be dedicated to serving God in this world (1 Cor. 7:7, 17, 32-
35). He was speaking to a general audience and so he does not oblige
it. But observe what he says in verse 17, “Only, everyone should
live as the Lord has assigned, just as God called each one. I give
this order in all the churches.” This coincides with the admonition
of Jesus to follow the vocation given by God, whether celibacy (Mt
19:12) or marriage (v.11).
Now Jesus said that if one could accept celibacy for the sake of the
Kingdom one should and Paul says it is the best way for those
dedicated to the Kingdom, and BOTH of them lived this total
dedication to the will of the Father for the salvation of souls.
Given the mentality of the world, both Jewish and Pagan, it was
impossible at the beginning to find mature candidates for the
priesthood who were not already married. Only with the arrival of a
generally Christian milieu, where virginity and celibacy were
honored into adult life, would celibate candidates for Holy Orders
be generally available. Not surprisingly, then, the Church discerned
with time that the gift of celibacy from God (who alone can give
such a gift), together with the desire to serve God and His people,
was an indication of a vocation to the priesthood. THIS has not
always and everywhere been imposed in the Church, but almost
immediately in Church history we find it recommended and even
required in some places. Although Latin Rite Catholic priests for
the last 1000 years have had to be celibate, Eastern Rite Catholic
priests and priests of the Orthodox Churches (not in union with
Rome) do not. However, ALL bishops in both the Catholic and Orthodox
Churches MUST be celibates. They represent Christ to the people in
their dioceses and Christ’s bride is the Church (Eph 5:21-33) not
someone else. So, it is entirely fitting that bishops not marry EVER
and that priests not marry either, though in some traditions it is
allowed PRIOR to ordination.
The fact that the apostles were married says nothing about the
practice, since they were Jewish and followed the practices of their
day, until Christ came along. Tradition affirms that they remained
celibates after they followed Christ.
With the grace of Redemption came the possibility of celibacy and
virginity for the sake of the Kingdom of God for more than the
privileged few. It is a total gift of self to the Lord, fitting for
those whose vocation is dedicated to love and service of God and
neighbor. Unfortunately, it is something the worldly who do not
understand the power of God have difficulty accepting, then as now.[/quote:mye6a4va]
Wonder perhaps ,why not have two priestly orders, a celibate order and a married order with each having differant priestly functions?December 16, 2006 at 4:14 am #7602About Catholics TeamKeymaster
[quote:dhm57nid]Wonder perhaps ,why not have two priestly orders, a celibate order and a married order with each having differant priestly functions?[/quote:dhm57nid]
What would the differences be?
That might set up a priest class system which would be kind of interesting. I’m not sure if it would be harmful or not.December 16, 2006 at 5:58 pm #7606AnonymousInactive
If you are a priest, you are a priest. Ordination is an indelible mark upon the soul such that even a priest that has been laicized by the Church (removed from his office as a priest) retains the ability to perform the sacraments (though he is bound by the Church to only provide the last rites in emergencies). To separate the priesthood’s duties amongst married and celibate priests would be injurious to the office of priest, especially in the mind of the laity.
On the other hand, however, we already have such separation. Deacons receive ordination but not the full ordination of the priests (who in turn do not receive the full ordination of the bishops). Deacons are not required to be celibate.December 21, 2006 at 6:33 pm #7617AnonymousInactive
[quote:2ng1wwtn]But Peter was.
For clarity, married men may join the priesthood in the Eastern Rites but priests may not marry. And Eastern Rite bishops must be celibate (they are not chosen from among married priests).[/quote:2ng1wwtn]But St. Paul wasn’t. Moreover Our Lord is the one who said that the celibate for the kingdom of God is the higher calling.
[color=darkblue:2ng1wwtn]Matthew 19:10: The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is not expedient to marry.”
11: But he said to them, “Not all men can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given.
12: For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it.”[/color:2ng1wwtn]
[b:2ng1wwtn]Blackie[/b:2ng1wwtn]January 2, 2007 at 11:38 pm #7651AnonymousInactive
The discipline before Vatican II was that at the ordination to the Sub-diaconate one had to be celebate and remain so. A man was then ordained to the diaconate and the priesthood. Some from the ranks of the priesthood where elevated to the episcopacy, (bishop).
If one was granted a dispensation from clerical vows, they could marry and where no longer required to pray the Office, (now Liturgy of the Hours) every day. If there was a danger of death, and somebody requried absolution, the Church supplies Jurisdiction, (Valid ordination and jurisdiction both requried for a valid absolution.) when no other priest with faculties, (Jurisdiction) can come to the aid of someone in danger of death, (the Ecclesiastical term is In Articulo Mortis). This would be in effect if the priest had been dispensed from his vows, or if the priest was outside of his diocese or province and did not have faculties for the place where the soul was in need.
While ministers who convert to the Catholic Faith have been ordained to the priesthood even though married, (with Papal dispensations) a priest who leaves and marries, is generally not given faculties or permitted to function as a priest (except as noted above) unless the marriage or attempted marriage ends with the death of the spouse. Even then the priest who left to marry is usually not granted faculties to function in public, but only in a cloistered monastic community.
Since Vatican II in the Latin (Western) Rites, (The Ambrosian and Mozarabic rite still exist in the west) only the Indult Orders still have the minor orders and Sub-diaconate. So now practically speaking a transitional deacon, (one who is going to be ordained a priest after the diaconate) is bound to celebacy. A married man who is ordained a premanent deacon may be married before he is ordained, may not re-marry after ordination if his wife dies. His wife also must agree to his ordination. If she dies, or in very rare cases decides to enter a cloistered convent, the deacon may continue his studies and be ordained a priest. In the West before Vatican II it was common for a priest to act as a deacon or sub-deacon at a solemn high mass, as only one priest would celebrate Mass at a time, (Except at ordinations of new priests or consecrations of bishops, where the ordaining bishopand those ordained concelebrated the Mass.)
In the Eastern Rites, marriage may take place before ordination to the diaconate, and priesthood. A deacon or priest who’s wife dies may not re-marry. Only a Celebate man may become a bishop, in rare cases this may be a man who’s wife died before his election to the epscopacy, as most bishops in the east (traditionally) come from monastic communities. In some places in the East, parish priests are married, and Monks and bishops are celebate. It has been a long standing practice in the east for some to remain in Minor Orders or the Diaconate and not advance to the priesthood. In the East concelebration has been a longstanding practice and one functions at the level one is ordained to, so if there are no deacons at hand, only priests, nobody vests as a deacon or functions in that role for the Mass, (Divine Liturgy) the priest(s) simply recite the deacon’s prayers along with his own.
As most priests have their food and housing paid for, and an allowance for a car (since they need one to visit parishoners and make sick calls, emergencies etc.) They recieve a small stipend from the parish, (around $300.00 a month, and stipends for masses, weddings and funerals) but anything that they need to buy, clothing clerical or not, chalice, books, gas, more expensive car than the allowance could afford, comes from the stipends they earn. So it is not as if they get everything paid for. They used to get a big break as many places would either give them a good discount or comp their meals etc. Not so much any more though.
So I guess I’d sum it up, that I think a celebate clergy is preferable, a married clergy is not unthinkable or contrary to the Catholic Faith. But most important, married or not, we will only have holy priests if we pray for them and their vocations, expect them to act in the manner that a priest should act, and let them know that we support the priesthood as a gift from our Lord to the Church which we and they should cherish.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.