Doctrinal Development, what is it?

Home Forums All Things Catholic Doctrinal Development, what is it?

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1005
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Doctrinal Development, what is it?

    Was just curious how you guys understood it.

    ~Victor

    #4035

    [quote:2a45hijf]Doctrinal Development, what is it?[/quote:2a45hijf]
    Good question. <img loading=” title=”Smile” /> I’m not sure what you’re getting at.

    I guess it’s the way a doctrine develops over time and unfolds naturally into the practice of the faith. <img loading=:” title=”Question” />

    #4036
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Well, from my understanding, public revelation and inspiration (oral and written) ended with the death of the last apostle (mostly likely John). What does this mean? Basically, everything God wanted us to know had an expiration date on it which was John. But that doesn’t mean that the Church had a clear understanding of it. The Lord made it clear that “He will come (Holy Spirit) to help you and guide you into all truth”. <–This isn’t a word for word.
    To me that make sense, because isn’t that how life is?
    It’s like having a physics course. A book and an instructor to guide you. All the information you need is there, but it will take you a while to come to understand it. Obviously the Apostles had an extra outpouring of Grace to speed their understanding but you still have the human factor that limits them from understanding God fully.

    Who can really grasp God fully?
    Not me, I have a hard enough time with the things down on earth.
    <img loading=” title=”Neutral” />

    ~Victor

    #4356
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Anyone want to take a stab at giving ONE example of something that falls under doctrinal development.

    ~Victor

    #4358
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    [color=darkblue:kmy7a2iv]How about the trinity?
    It was known and believed all along, but it developed as the church grew and discussed things like the hypostatic union and the diety of Jesus and the Holy Spirit, Right?

    The doctrines on the diety of Jesus and the Holy Spirit then developed along with that, even though all of this was believed by the early church.

    It’s just that as the church lives out its relationship with God (as with any relationship) we come to know and understand God better and what the relationship means to us. It doesn’t change the relationship except to deepen it.
    Pax vobiscum,[/color:kmy7a2iv]

    #4359
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That’s a good example Black Knight. How about all the mysterious surronding Mary? Those would also be doctrinal development right?

    ~Victor

    #4368
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m currently reading Cardinal Newman’s book about doctrinal development, and he addresses a number of instances of this, as well as some terrifically deep and awfully, awfully, too, too Nineteenth century writing about the process of development. He also related this to the communion of the saints, purgatory, and the Eucharist. You might want to check this out…

    #4560
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    As an example of the Development of doctrine:

    The Church has always and will always teach that Christ is present, Body and Blood, in the Eucharist. However, it was not until 1215 (Fourth Lateran Council? I’m not good on Council names but for osme reason that seems to be sticking out–I am probably wrong, knowing me), that the Church officially defined it, as well as using the word “Transubstantiation” to define the process of the bread and wine COMPLETELY changing into the Body and Blood.

    Maybe that’s not what your looking for, but I think it is.

    #4566
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hmm…..not exactly sure if that is one. Although the church takes a while to define things, the substance of the doctrine in it’s entirety sure seems to be there with the Eucharist. You can read several early church fathers that saw the Eucharist as we see it now. I could be wrong, but I guess I don’t see much GROWTH in the Church when it comes to the Eucharist. It was mystery back then, it’s a mystery now.

    ~Victor

    How about the Papacy?

    #4570
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    [quote:1rdik2cv]Hmm…..not exactly sure if that is one. Although the church takes a while to define things, the substance of the doctrine in it’s entirety sure seems to be there with the Eucharist. You can read several early church fathers that saw the Eucharist as we see it now. I could be wrong, but I guess I don’t see much GROWTH in the Church when it comes to the Eucharist. It was mystery back then, it’s a mystery now.

    ~Victor

    How about the Papacy?[/quote:1rdik2cv]

    Hmm… I think I know what you are getting at. I think the Trinity is definitely the best example of development of Doctrine, but I’m sure there are others.

    #4574
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I got one!!!
    The canon of scripture!! It wasn’t put together until 397. It’s not like the Church had a CLEAR view of what belonged in the Bible. There was a sort of growth that was assisted by the Holy Spirit in this one. What do you think?

    ~Victor

    #4576
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yeah, that is definitely a good one.

    #4581

    Why, exactly, are we trying to find all these examples? Is there a greater lesson, Victor, or are you just wanting illustrations?

    #4582
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Well originally I was trying to get someone to answer the question “what is doctrinal develpment?” and then I was getting to “how does it work?”. I haven’t done any intense reading in this area and I am quite curious about it. Is this something that does not catch your interest?

    ~Victor

    #4584

    [quote:63nxquiz]Is this something that does not catch your interest?[/quote:63nxquiz]
    It’s not that. I was just wondering. <img loading=” title=”Very Happy” />

    #4593
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    What about the differences between venial and mortal sin, and actual and original sin?

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.