- This topic has 1 reply, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
March 28, 2007 at 8:56 pm #1616AnonymousInactive
Did Jesus have a last name?March 28, 2007 at 9:42 pm #7964AnonymousInactive
Names at that time would have been based on ones father’s name. Therefore Jesus would have been referred to as Yoshuah ben Joseph. Or Jesus son of Joseph. Surnames had not yet been used, although trades where sometimes used, just as we have today, James Taylor, who’s ancestor was probably a taylor, or Matt Brewer, who probably had an ancestor who brewed mead or beer, but those names where primarily later and Western European.March 28, 2007 at 9:52 pm #7965About Catholics TeamKeymaster
I thought it was Christ…” title=”Wink” />March 28, 2007 at 10:52 pm #7967AnonymousInactive
No. Although many people refer to Him as Jesus Christ, the Greek word translated as “Christ” is cristos,which means “anointed” and was commonly used to refer to the prophesied “messiah” or savior. It would be more proper grammatically to say the phrase, Jesus, the Christ.March 28, 2007 at 11:57 pm #7968About Catholics TeamKeymaster
[quote:3k5oljgv]No. Although many people refer to Him as Jesus Christ, the Greek word translated as “Christ” is cristos,which means “anointed” and was commonly used to refer to the prophesied “messiah” or savior. It would be more proper grammatically to say the phrase, Jesus, the Christ.[/quote:3k5oljgv]
I know that… ” title=”Smile” /> I was just joking as referenced by the ” title=”Wink” />March 29, 2007 at 12:00 am #7969AnonymousInactive
Jon: your comment does bring up a good point. Since the state of catechetical teaching is so poor nowadays. It is also common for people to think His name was Jesus H Christ. This comes from the middle ages when Jesus was abbreviated as JHS or IHS, which is a transliteration of the Greek abbreviation IC XC (Jesus Christ abbreviated) Anti-Catholics like Hislop, who looked for anything that may even in the slightest way be paired up with ancient Pagan Mythology to “disprove” the teachings Christ gave to the Church started a lie that IHS was the abbreviation of Isis Horace Set (Sometimes called Seth in older textbooks) as “proof” that the Catholic Church was of Pagan origins. Hislop along with a few other fabricators was exposed as a dullard and dupe, and his “research” turned out to be a rehashing of other Anti-Catholic inventions.
Hislop’s paranoid psychosis went so far as claiming that candles where a Catholic Invention, and that Priests wearing special clothing where a Catholic Invention. So I guess if we disrgard authentic history and take Hislop’s stance, (which I may suggest everyone read, as you’ll quickly see that many online Anti-Catholics who’s arguments including misspellings come directly from Hislop and a few other anti-Catholics of the 1880′ and turn of the century’s books.) then we can’t use candles, and rather than inventions of special clothing worn by priests, the Church being conservative, (meaning retaining those things passed onto us from previous generations) retained the clothing common of the period when Christ founded the Church, (vestments used today are simply modern interpretations of the day to day clothing worn in the Mediterranian in the days of Christ and the Apostles.
Summing it up, those ignorant or blind to history are caught unaware of the truth that is ignored by Anti-Catholics like Hislop and his followers. Yet these same “Bible Believing” folks who reject all things Catholic, swallow Hislop hook line and sinker, and place more credence in his books because they trash Christ and His Church than the Catholic Church gives authority to the Pope. Living in a LaLa land of ones own invention must have it’s benefits, but I guess there are those who would rather that you believe they and their private interpretations of the Bible are always correct rather than those of us who would rather believe that Christ is always correct and as God He could found a Church and uphold His promise to remain with it until the consumation of the earth.March 30, 2007 at 8:50 pm #7981AnonymousInactive
Did any person mentioned in the bible have a last name? If so why were they not written in the Bible.March 31, 2007 at 8:22 am #7988AnonymousInactive
Perhaps Pontius Pilate and several other non-Jewish Biblical characters had last names. But as LARobert pointed out, Jewish last names were essentially rehashes of the father’s name (and that for purposes of lineage and identification (most Biblical Jewish names were shared by many people in the same area)).
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.